Current:Home > MySeattle plastic surgery provider accused of posting fake positive reviews must pay $5M -VisionFunds
Seattle plastic surgery provider accused of posting fake positive reviews must pay $5M
View
Date:2025-04-24 17:38:27
SEATTLE (AP) — A Seattle-area plastic surgery provider accused of threatening patients over negative reviews and posting fake positive ones must pay $5 million to the state attorney general’s office and thousands of Washington patients, according to a federal consent decree.
The consent decree filed Monday resolves a lawsuit brought by Attorney General Bob Ferguson in December 2022, The Seattle Times reported. The complaint accused Allure Esthetic and owner Dr. Javad Sajan of violating state and federal consumer protection laws by posting the false reviews and forcing patients to sign nondisclosure agreements barring them from posting or saying anything negative about Allure.
The resolution, filed in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, requires Allure to pay about $1.5 million in restitution to about 21,000 people. People who were forced to sign illegal NDAs will each receive $50, while those who paid a nonrefundable consultation fee before they signed an illegal NDA will receive $120.
The remainder of the money, about $3.5 million, will go to Ferguson’s office for attorney fees, litigation costs and monitoring and enforcing of the consent decree, according to the resolution.
“Writing a truthful review about a business should not subject you to threats or intimidation,” Ferguson said in a statement. “Consumers rely on reviews when determining who to trust, especially services that affect their health and safety. This resolution holds Allure accountable for brazenly violating that trust — and the law — and ensures the clinic stops its harmful conduct.”
Erin M. O’Leary, an attorney for Allure Esthetic, said in a statement that the decision to settle was not easy but the company is pleased to have resolved the case.
“The cooperative settlement, while not admitting fault and resolving claims asserted by both sides, allows Allure Esthetic to continue to focus on its core mission of providing compassionate care to patients,” O’Leary said.
Sajan, the owner of Allure, is based in Seattle. Allure also does business under several other names, including Alderwood Surgical Center, Gallery of Cosmetic Surgery, Seattle Plastic Surgery, Northwest Nasal Sinus Center and Northwest Face & Body, according to the lawsuit. The Alderwood Surgical Center and Northwest Nasal Sinus Center are also named in the consent decree.
The company provides surgical and nonsurgical services including plastic and cosmetic procedures, according to its website.
The complaint accused Allure of illegal business practices including artificially inflating its ratings on Yelp and Google by posting fake positive reviews and suppressing negative ones that were real.
According to the lawsuit, the company also rigged “best doctor” competitions hosted by local media outlets, kept tens of thousands of dollars in rebates intended for patients and altered before-and-after photos of procedures on patients.
Allure threatened to sue and did sue some patients if they did not take down negative reviews, according to the complaint. In some instances it offered patients cash and free services or products in exchange for taking down negative reviews. The practice also had more than 10,000 patients sign nondisclosure agreements before receiving treatment that restricted them from posting negative reviews online, the lawsuit said.
Sajan “personally authorized” the amount of money or value of services offered to patients who posted negative comments, the lawsuit said. He also allegedly directed employees to create fake email accounts to pose as patients and post positive reviews.
The resolution also requires Allure to hire a third-party forensic accounting firm to conduct an independent audit of its consumer rebate program to identify those who are owed rebates and, upon request, provide the attorney general’s office with proof of compliance with the terms of the consent decree for the next 10 years.
If Allure or any of its related businesses violate the terms, they could face civil penalties up to $125,000 per violation.
veryGood! (224)
Related
- Krispy Kreme offers a free dozen Grinch green doughnuts: When to get the deal
- InsideClimate News to Host 2019 Investigative Journalism Fellow
- Kim Zolciak Spotted Without Wedding Ring Amid Kroy Biermann Divorce
- Today’s Climate: September 7, 2010
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- Don't Let These 60% Off Good American Deals Sell Out Before You Can Add Them to Your Cart
- Hillary Clinton’s Choice of Kaine as VP Tilts Ticket Toward Political Center
- Today’s Climate: September 3, 2010
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Why China's 'zero COVID' policy is finally faltering
Ranking
- The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
- Scottish Scientists Develop Whisky Biofuel
- Today’s Climate: August 18, 2010
- Chile Cancels Plan to Host UN Climate Summit Amid Civil Unrest at Home
- Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
- Today’s Climate: August 28-29, 2010
- A Guide to Father of 7 Robert De Niro's Sprawling Family Tree
- Coach Outlet's New Y2K Shop Has 70% Off Deals on Retro-Inspired Styles
Recommendation
Krispy Kreme offers a free dozen Grinch green doughnuts: When to get the deal
Destructive Flood Risk in U.S. West Could Triple if Climate Change Left Unchecked
Baltimore Sues 26 Fossil Fuels Companies Over Climate Change
Lupita Nyong'o Celebrates Her Newly Shaved Head With Stunning Selfie
Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
In the hunt for a male contraceptive, scientists look to stop sperm in their tracks
Twitter will no longer enforce its COVID misinformation policy
The chase is on: Regulators are slowly cracking down on vapes aimed at teens