Current:Home > MySouth Korean court orders 2 Japanese companies to compensate wartime Korean workers for forced labor -VisionFunds
South Korean court orders 2 Japanese companies to compensate wartime Korean workers for forced labor
View
Date:2025-04-14 03:05:44
SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — South Korea’s top court ordered two Japanese companies to financially compensate more of their wartime Korean workers for forced labor, as it sided Thursday with its contentious 2018 verdicts that caused a huge setback in relations between the two countries.
But observers say Thursday’s ruling won’t likely hurt bilateral ties much since Seoul and Tokyo, now governed by different leaders, are pushing hard to bolster their partnerships in the face of shared challenges like North Korea’s evolving nuclear threats and China’s increasing assertiveness.
The Supreme Court ruled that Mitsubishi Heavy Industries must provide between 100 million and 150 million won ($76,700 and $115,000) in compensation to each of four plaintiffs — bereaved families of its former employees who were forced to work for the company during Japan’s 1910-45 colonial rule of the Korean Peninsula. The court also said Nippon Steel Corp. must give 100 million won (about $76,700) to each of seven Korean plaintiffs for similar colonial-era forced labor.
In two separate verdicts in 2018, the top South Korean court ordered Mitsubishi and Nippon Steel to compensate a total of 15 other Korean employees for forced labor. That irked Japan, which has insisted all compensation issues were already settled by a 1965 bilateral treaty that normalized their diplomatic relations. But the 2018 South Korean court rulings said the treaty cannot prevent individual rights to seek compensations for forced labor because Japanese companies’ use of such laborers were “acts of illegality against humanity” that were linked to Tokyo’s illegal colonial occupation and its war of aggression.
In Thursday’s ruling, the South Korean Supreme Court cited that argument in one of the 2018 verdicts, saying it paved the way for “a judicial remedy for forced labor victims within Republic of Korea.” Japan’s Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi called the ruling “absolutely unacceptable” as it clearly violated the 1965 treaty.
The wrangling touched off by the 2018 rulings led to the two countries downgrading each other’s trade status, and Seoul’s previous liberal government threatening to spike a military intelligence-sharing pact. Their strained ties complicated efforts by the United States to build a stronger trilateral cooperation to counter challenges posed by North Korea and China.
The Seoul-Tokyo relations, however, began thawing after South Korea’s current conservative president, Yoon Suk Yeol, announced in March that his country would use a local corporate fund to compensate the forced labor victims without demanding Japanese contributions. Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida later expressed sympathy for the suffering of Korean forced laborers during a Seoul visit. The two countries revived high-level talks and withdrew economic retaliatory steps against each other.
Eleven of the 15 former forced laborers or their families involved in the 2018 rulings had accepted compensation under Seoul’s third-party reimbursement plan, but the remaining four still refuse to accept it, according to their support group.
“I believe the South Korean government will continue its utmost effort in order to gain the understanding of the plaintiffs,” Hayashi said.
Choi Eunmi, a Japan expert at South Korea’s Asan Institute Policy Institute in Seoul, said Thursday’s ruling “won’t likely cause big troubles in Korea-Japan relationships” as South Korea has already determined how to handle such verdicts with the establishment of the domestic compensation fund.
Choi said that, because some forced labor victims refuse to accept compensation under the third-party reimbursement system, the South Korean fund hasn’t completely resolved the issue. But she said an attempt by a future South Korean government to spike the system would undermine South Korea’s credibility in Japan and deteriorate bilateral ties severely.
Yoon’s push to improve ties with Japan drew strong backlash from some of the forced labor victims and liberal opposition politicians, who have demanded direct compensation from the Japanese companies. But Yoon defended his move, saying it’s essential to boosting ties with Japan to jointly cope with North Korea’s advancing nuclear arsenal, the intensifying U.S.-China rivalry and global supply chain challenges.
___
Associated Press writer Mari Yamaguchi in Tokyo contributed to this report.
veryGood! (3)
Related
- Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
- Drea de Matteo says she joined OnlyFans after her stance against vaccine mandates lost her work
- Ex-Guatemala anti-corruption prosecutor granted asylum in US
- How Real Housewives Alum Jen Shah and Elizabeth Holmes Have Bonded in Prison
- Trump invites nearly all federal workers to quit now, get paid through September
- Sean Penn goes after studio execs' 'daughter' in bizarre comments over AI debate
- Mexican drug cartels pay Americans to smuggle weapons across the border, intelligence documents show
- Bangladesh is struggling to cope with a record dengue outbreak in which 778 people have died
- Residents worried after ceiling cracks appear following reroofing works at Jalan Tenaga HDB blocks
- Holly Madison Reveals Why Hugh Hefner Hated Red Lipstick on Playboy Models
Ranking
- Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
- General Hospital’s John J. York Taking Hiatus Amid Battle With 2 Blood and Bone Marrow Disorders
- Stock market today: Asian shares gain after data show China’s economy stabilizing in August
- Dustin Johnson says he would be a part of Ryder Cup team if not for LIV Golf defection
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Zelenskyy is expected to visit Capitol Hill as Congress is debating $21 billion in aid for Ukraine
- Buffalo Bills reporter apologizes after hot mic catches her talking about Stefon Diggs
- Why are the Jets 'cursed' and Barrymore (kind of) canceled? Find out in the news quiz
Recommendation
Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
Imagine making shadowy data brokers erase your personal info. Californians may soon live the dream
Ex-Guatemala anti-corruption prosecutor granted asylum in US
Anitta Shares She Had a Cancer Scare Amid Months-Long Hospitalization
The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
Analysis shows Ohio’s new universal voucher program already exceeds cost estimates
Climate protesters around the world are calling for an end to fossils fuels as the Earth heats up
With Mel Tucker suspended, five possible replacement candidates for Michigan State