Current:Home > reviewsConnecticut Senate passes wide-ranging bill to regulate AI. But its fate remains uncertain -VisionFunds
Connecticut Senate passes wide-ranging bill to regulate AI. But its fate remains uncertain
View
Date:2025-04-12 02:25:30
HARTFORD (AP) — The Connecticut Senate pressed ahead Wednesday with one of the first major legislative proposals in the U.S. to rein in bias in artificial intelligence decision-making and protect people from harm, including manufactured videos or deepfakes.
The vote was held despite concerns the bill might stifle innovation, become a burden for small businesses and make the state an outlier.
The bill passed 24-12 after a lengthy debate. It is the result of two years of task force meetings in Connecticut and a year’s worth of collaboration among a bipartisan group of legislators from other states who are trying to prevent a patchwork of laws across the country because Congress has yet to act.
“I think that this is a very important bill for the state of Connecticut. It’s very important I think also for the country as a first step to get a bill like this,” said Democratic Sen. James Maroney, the key author of the bill. “Even if it were not to come and get passed into law this year, we worked together as states.”
Lawmakers from Connecticut, Colorado, Texas, Alaska, Georgia and Virginia who have been working together on the issue have found themselves in the middle of a national debate between civil rights-oriented groups and the industry over the core components of the legislation. Several of the legislators, including Maroney, participated in a news conference last week to emphasize the need for legislation and highlight how they have worked with industry, academia and advocates to create proposed regulations for safe and trustworthy AI.
But Senate Minority Leader Stephen Harding said he felt like Connecticut senators were being rushed to vote on the most complicated piece of legislation of the session, which is scheduled to adjourn May 8. The Republican said he feared the bill was “full of unintended consequences” that could prove detrimental to businesses and residents in the state.
“I think our constituents are owed more thought, more consideration to this before we push that button and say this is now going to become law,” he said.
Besides pushback from Republican legislators, some key Democrats in Connecticut, including Gov. Ned Lamont, have voiced concern the bill may negatively impact an emerging industry. Lamont, a former cable TV entrepreneur, “remains concerned that this is a fast-moving space, and that we need to make sure we do this right and don’t stymie innovation,” his spokesperson Julia Bergman said in a statement.
Among other things, the bill includes protections for consumers, tenants and employees by attempting to target risks of AI discrimination based on race, age, religion, disability and other protected classes. Besides making it a crime to spread so-called deepfake pornography and deceptive AI-generated media in political campaigns, the bill requires digital watermarks on AI-generated images for transparency.
Additionally, certain AI users will be required to develop policies and programs to eliminate risks of AI discrimination.
The legislation also creates a new online AI Academy where Connecticut residents can take classes in AI and ensures AI training is part of state workforce development initiatives and other state training programs. There are some concerns the bill doesn’t go far enough, with calls by advocates to restore a requirement that companies must disclose more information to consumers before they can use AI to make decisions about them.
The bill now awaits action in the House of Representatives.
veryGood! (87)
Related
- Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
- How One Native American Tribe is Battling for Control Over Flaring
- What went wrong at Silicon Valley Bank? The Fed is set to release a postmortem report
- A Biomass Power Plant in Rural North Carolina Reignites Concerns Over Clean Energy and Environmental Justice
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- Airbnb let its workers live and work anywhere. Spoiler: They're loving it
- Why Did California Regulators Choose a Firm with Ties to Chevron to Study Irrigating Crops with Oil Wastewater?
- In the Democratic Republic of Congo, the Unintended Consequences of ‘Fortress Conservation’
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Step up Your Fashion With the Top 17 Trending Amazon Styles Right Now
Ranking
- The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
- Pete Davidson Admits His Mom Defended Him on Twitter From Burner Account
- 'Let's Get It On' ... in court
- Inside Clean Energy: How Should We Account for Emerging Technologies in the Push for Net-Zero?
- B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
- Who bears the burden, and how much, when religious employees refuse Sabbath work?
- Sue Johanson, Sunday Night Sex Show Host, Dead at 93
- Twitter removes all labels about government ties from NPR and other outlets
Recommendation
Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
'We're just at a breaking point': Hollywood writers vote to authorize strike
The Clean Energy Transition Enters Hyperdrive
From Spring to Fall, New York Harbor Is a Feeding Ground for Bottlenose Dolphins, a New Study Reveals
All That You Wanted to Know About She’s All That
Boy Meets World's Original Topanga Actress Alleges She Was Fired for Not Being Pretty Enough
Why Chris Evans Deactivated His Social Media Accounts
Despite Layoffs, There Are Still Lots Of Jobs Out There. So Where Are They?