Current:Home > NewsAppeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight -VisionFunds
Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
View
Date:2025-04-18 15:02:03
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (2497)
Related
- Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
- Facebook is rebranding as Meta — but the app you use will still be called Facebook
- Facebook Apologizes After Its AI Labels Black Men As 'Primates'
- A Judge Rules Apple Must Make It Easier To Shop Outside The App Store
- Rylee Arnold Shares a Long
- Lawmakers Push Facebook To Abandon Instagram For Kids, Citing Mental Health Concerns
- Is The Future Of The Internet In The Metaverse?
- A cyberattack paralyzed every gas station in Iran
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- 4 takeaways from the Senate child safety hearing with YouTube, Snapchat and TikTok
Ranking
- Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
- Biden welcomed as one of us in Irish Parliament
- Oscars 2023: Malala Officially Calls a Truce Between Chris Pine and Harry Styles After #Spitgate
- Megan Fox Debuts Fiery New Look in Risqué Appearance at Oscars 2023 After-Party
- Why Sean "Diddy" Combs Is Being Given a Laptop in Jail Amid Witness Intimidation Fears
- Renowned mountain climber Noel Hanna dies descending from peak of Nepal's treacherous Annapurna
- Sudan military factions at war with each other leave civilians to cower as death toll tops 100
- Hailey Bieber's Oscars Party Look Proves You Should Never Say Never to a Classic Black Gown
Recommendation
NFL Week 15 picks straight up and against spread: Bills, Lions put No. 1 seed hopes on line
TikTokers Are Trading Stocks By Copying What Members Of Congress Do
Flying Microchips The Size Of A Sand Grain Could Be Used For Population Surveillance
Colombia police director removed who spoke about using exorcisms to catch fugitives
EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
These Oscars 2023 Behind-the-Scenes Photos of Rihanna, Ke Huy Quan and More Deserve an Award
See Angela Bassett and More Black Panther Stars Marvelously Take Over the 2023 Oscars
Unpopular plan to raise France's retirement age from 62 to 64 approved by Constitutional Council