Current:Home > reviewsRepublican prosecutor will appeal judge’s ruling invalidating Wisconsin’s 174-year-old abortion ban -VisionFunds
Republican prosecutor will appeal judge’s ruling invalidating Wisconsin’s 174-year-old abortion ban
View
Date:2025-04-15 19:23:37
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A Republican prosecutor said Tuesday that he plans to appeal a court ruling that Wisconsin law permits consensual medical abortions, the first step toward a potential showdown in the state Supreme Court over abortion rights.
Sheboygan County District Attorney Joel Urmanski issued a statement through his attorneys saying that he disagrees with Dane County Circuit Judge Diane Schlipper’s July finding and state law clearly bans abortions, including consensual medical abortions.
The case appears destined to end up at the state Supreme Court.
Liberal justices currently hold a 4-3 majority on the court, making it unlikely that conservatives would prevail at that level. Urmanski could string out the process beyond the 2025 spring elections, however, in the hopes that liberal Justice Ann Walsh Bradley loses re-election and conservatives regain control of the court.
In question is an 1849 Wisconsin law that conservatives have interpreted as banning abortion. The U.S. Supreme Court’s June 2022 decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 decision legalizing abortion, reactivated the law. Abortion providers subsequently ceased operations in the state out of fear of violating the ban.
Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul filed a lawsuit days after the Supreme Court decision, challenging the ban’s validity. He argued the statutes were too old to enforce and a 1985 law permitting abortions before fetuses can survive outside the womb trumps the ban. Three doctors later joined the lawsuit as plaintiffs, saying they fear being prosecuted for performing abortions.
Urmanski is defending the ban in court. The city of Sheboygan is home to one of Planned Parenthood’s three Wisconsin clinics that provide abortions. The others are in Madison and Milwaukee.
Schlipper ruled this past July that the abortion ban prohibits someone from attacking a woman in an attempt to kill her unborn child but doesn’t apply to consensual medical abortions. Her finding didn’t formally end the lawsuit but Planned Parenthood was confident enough in the ruling to resume abortion procedures at their Madison and Milwaukee clinics in September.
Urmanski later filed a motion asking Schlipper to reconsider her ruling. She refused in a 14-page opinion issued Tuesday, writing that Urmanski failed to show how she misapplied state law or made any other mistake and declared that the plaintiffs had won the suit.
She also declined the doctors’ request to issue an injunction prohibiting prosecutors from charging abortion providers, saying she’s confidant prosecutors will follow her ruling.
Dane County District Attorney Ismael Ozanne and Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm, both Democrats, have said they would abide by Schlipper’s ruling. Urmanski has said he would abide by it as well. He reiterated in his statement Tuesday that he’s obligated to follow the ruling unless it’s stayed on appeal.
Kaul said during a news conference Wednesday morning before Urmanski’s announcement that he fully expected an appeal.
“This decision can be appealed. I expect that it likely will be,” Kaul said. “And so other courts will weigh in on this. But for now, this is a major win for reproductive freedom in Wisconsin, and we are prepared to defend that victory and reproductive freedom as we move forward.”
___
Associated Press writer Scott Bauer contributed to this report.
veryGood! (31734)
Related
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- The Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Climate Change. Is it Ready to Decide Which Courts Have Jurisdiction?
- How Much Global Warming Is Fossil Fuel Infrastructure Locking In?
- With Only a Week Left in Trump’s Presidency, a Last-Ditch Effort to Block Climate Action and Deny the Science
- Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
- Adding Batteries to Existing Rooftop Solar Could Qualify for 30 Percent Tax Credit
- U.S. Mayors Pressure Congress on Carbon Pricing, Climate Lawsuits and a Green New Deal
- Overdose deaths from fentanyl combined with xylazine surge in some states, CDC reports
- Bodycam footage shows high
- The Idol Makeup Artist Kirsten Coleman Reveals Euphoria Easter Eggs in the New Series
Ranking
- Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
- Bindi Irwin Honors Parents Steve and Terri's Eternal Love in Heartfelt Anniversary Message
- Court Sides With Trump on Keystone XL Permit, but Don’t Expect Fast Progress
- The US Rejoins the Paris Agreement, but Rebuilding Credibility on Climate Action Will Take Time
- Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
- In Attacks on Environmental Advocates in Canada, a Disturbing Echo of Extremist Politics in the US
- Overstock.com to rebrand as Bed Bath & Beyond after purchasing its assets
- Biden says Supreme Court's affirmative action decision can't be the last word
Recommendation
Selena Gomez engaged to Benny Blanco after 1 year together: 'Forever begins now'
Geothermal: Tax Breaks and the Google Startup Bringing Earth’s Heat into Homes
Semi-truck driver was actively using TikTok just before fiery Arizona car crash that killed 5, officials say
Tibetan Nomads Struggle as Grasslands Disappear from the Roof of the World
Woman dies after Singapore family of 3 gets into accident in Taiwan
10 Brands That Support LGBTQIA+ Efforts Now & Always: Savage X Fenty, Abercrombie, TomboyX & More
Activists Gird for a Bigger Battle Over Oil and Fumes from a Port City’s Tank Farms
The Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Climate Change. Is it Ready to Decide Which Courts Have Jurisdiction?